The Wire Mafia III

And dead chat if there was one. The rage in there is usually an entertaining read

 

http://www.quicktopic.com/51/H/M2eg9hti8gnj

Dead person QT.

http://quicktopic.com/51/H/AYf6QNgUMmnap

Stanfield QT.

 

Haha get over it already. Already explained the situation in the Dead Man QT but you keep moaning about it in like 4 different occasions now.

Besides, You had cocked up by illogically claiming watcher and trying to get Gazza lynched by the time you would have used that ability anyway.

 

I'm actually with Cevno on this one. Didn't make that clear at all and the time pressure forced him to make a snap decision. Inactive mafia qts always risk causing mistakes like that - have better discussion n0 and that would never have happened

 

Funny thing is when I first saw Captain's "noted" post I kind of took it to be sarcastic and wasn't going to change anything. It was only when he and Blunder started talking about it that I bottled it.

 

I stated clearly that I was doing nothing in the Qt, and was doing so a) to save my ability and b) because I wanted to set up a potential claim.

Cevno, out of nowhere, changes my orders for no reason and potentially fucks me over had I been tracked/my victim was being watched.

And Cevno, you keep bringing up my failed watcher claim as if it has any relevance to your idiocy. It doesn't. Stop Cevnoing.

 

Yeah he only didt that though because he was getting pushed into making orders by Howe. He didn't know everyone else would have sent orders in separately. In every maf game i've been mafia we've decided collectively what everyone does each night and made a list

 

Btw, Howe to an extent spoiled the purpose whatever there was of Janitoring Half back also by dropping the drive by hint.

Otherwise atleast it would have atleast been a question for the town and also Third party as to how many mafia were left and a potential WIFOM in terms of role claims.

 

Yeah being able to claim a Barksdale in the late game would have been mega useful.

 

Why over-rule someone who's clearly stated what they're doing?

 

Tempted too but cbf'd getting into a argument over this with you again. Already explained the situation quite clearly in the QT and it wouldn't have mattered half as much as you are making out anyway.

And who talked about claiming barksdale? I was talking about Town/Third party not knowing how many maf were left. For example heef or Captain at the end. And when town like Blunder were guessing based on claims made and who claimed important characters not knowing what the half back was would have been a potential doubt always.

Obviously this won't be comprehensible for you again, but thought i'd clarify anyway.

Post number #37 and #41 of Dead man QT. Read over SLOWLY again. And Jeez stop being a crybaby and let it go already.

 

No.

 

I would say you stated what you were doing but you didnt clearly state what you were doing. Combined with the fact everything was rushed through at the end it was a very easy mistake to make. I think everyone has to take their share of the blame there and miscommunication and inactivity is the reason for it - not one person