Melbourne still seem to have the same weakness as last year, their forward pack. Warriors rolled all over them, but only really lost because of Inu. That's the way to beat them.
There's a difference between hating a player and just not thinking he's very good. People aren't biased the minute they disagree with the general populous - it just means they have a brain.
Yeah the Roosters did the same to them, their big forwards dominated them, only lost because of shitty finishing and loose defence. I think Melbourne will suffer the same fate as last year. Don't see anybody else besides the Sharks or Cowboys rising towards the end and dominating the finals series.
At risk of sounding too much like Lukic, I think their selection and general tactics may cost them in the end. There's no way they can win the comp with the middle third (including middle third forwards and the spine) they try to operate with at the moment.
Reckon Prince had a good game. He's been pretty good this season actually. Will be dire if his arm injury is serious
Rubbish, I thought Hodges was awesome even when he played for the Roosters. You have a reason to hate him, because he is better than tate. No, it just shows that you are wrong.
Wow. Then you really are retarded. Either way, I don't believe for a second that you rode his cock the way you do now. Did you think he was awesome for QLD back then too? Greg Inglis is better than Tate. I don't hate Inglis. Fuck you're bad at this. You already said it's because of bias. Make up your mind, you can't have it both ways and actually you're wrong twice.
Haha I love that, I noticed Wallace takes the last hit up when they do the outside inside thing, like we used to do with Lockyer, Wallace and Hunt where Hunt would take the hit up etc. Dunno if that's legible, phones cactus.
More worried about Moltzen at fullback and whether they're finally going to settle on a halfback or not; Woods/Galloway/Bell/Cashmere is a pretty good prop rotation regardless of who they play at lock. One of Blair or Fulton would obviously be far more beneficial than Heighington but it's no more of a negative than I can find in the other contenders.
