CPL ideas and suggestions

Discussion in 'CPL Cricket' started by Cribbage, May 18, 2011.

  1. Gazza GJ Weaver

    More players retained if squads to be bigger imo
     
  2. Gazza GJ Weaver

    Or possibly, teams in the bottom half of the table get to retain more players than teams in the top half.
     
  3. morgieb MC Burridge

    I like this idea, doubt the better sides will go for it though.
     
  4. Cevno IV Narang

    What would happen if there are to be new sides though ?
     
  5. morgieb MC Burridge

    The old sides were still able to retain some of their players when much more new sides and much bigger squads were introduced iirc (last season it was 16 x 13. This time it's 22 x 18)
     
  6. Chewie JA Chewie

    Would like a team next time :smile1:
     
  7. Gazza GJ Weaver

    They would just have to pick from the unretained players. There should still be a group of quality players that weren't retained.

    Could even be the bottom 4 teams that get 1 or 2 extra retained players and rest with a set number.
     
  8. Cevno IV Narang


    But if more retentions are allowed for 22 existing teams then most of the best players would be retained in any case.
    As team owners would want to play safe rather than risk it with potentially say 23/25 other teams vying for the same player .

    And if more teams are added and squads made bigger ,then retaining as many players as you can makes more sense as the dillution of talent will be even wider than it is now ,except of course the teams with the retired players.
     
    Last edited: May 19, 2011
  9. Julian BJ Taylor

    I like the retention module that we had for this season. A couple of teams (mine definitely included) didn't use their retention well enough. For instance I should have retained Herath as a round 11 pick and Tuffey as a round 12 pick.
     
  10. Cribbage RG Cribb

    Yeah. It's basically going to be the same as that. Which rounds picks actually count as will change a bit though.

    For example, lets say we have 26 teams. If you have pick #23, that would have been made in Round 2 in Season 2.. but in Season 3, pick #23 is a Round 1 pick, so if you retain the bloke, you lose your Round 1.
     
  11. Julian BJ Taylor

    Yeah that makes sense.

    We have to be careful with who we include though IMO.
     
  12. Gazza GJ Weaver

    Still gonna be 4 players then?
     
  13. Cribbage RG Cribb

    Dunno, maybe a couple more.
     
  14. Gazza GJ Weaver

    5/6 would be gun tbh
     
  15. Verigoat S Verigotta

    Chandigod is gonna be the best retention out of the lot in terms of the round
     
  16. morgieb MC Burridge

    I think around 6. May make retentions very interesting tstl, particularly for the better sides.

    Also, Crabb, do you think that Marcuss knowing the simming averages makes his side at a big advantage?
     
  17. Cribbage RG Cribb

    Six seems good. A third of the players.

    If I change the rounds to reflect it properly then there's no reason we can't have more than 5. I could make it a bit stricter and not allow you to retain two Round 1 picks if you have two (for example) and allow up to 8, even.
     
  18. Cribbage RG Cribb

    Marcuss doesn't know the simming averages. He knows a couple of things (best batsman, best bowler etc) because I thought he was gonna get the database, but in the end he didn't get it because I'm simming it. So he knows fuck all tbh.
     
  19. Verigoat S Verigotta

    Not keeping 2 round 1 picks would be gun for overall picking for new people

    and well...me because I need it :laugh:
     
  20. Cevno IV Narang

    So Spark knows the simming averages for CWPL?

    Itstl ninjai
     

Share This Page