From my experience Baxter is usually hard to convince of a lynch, him agreeing with Qaggas without anything other than a suggestion concerns me. Qaggers, Baxter or Heef have to go, IMO.
Nope, I went for AVA, got told my action was unsuccessful, unlike night 0 where I saw heef go to Uppercut. Was going to wait and see what the result of The Rock's visit was, and then annouce this after the lynch if we got a clear ID on someone.
What evidence do you need from me to prove my innocence? I visited Uppercut on n0, and what I found out prevented a lynch on him. I confirmed he was town which he turned out to be.
Nope, not doing it. I'm hoisted by the petard of history on that one. I'm happy to role claim, but not character claim.
By which, for avoidance of doubt, I mean that if I character claim against my past refusal to claim then it'll be picked up as a reason to lynch me whilst if I don't character claim, it's also picked up as a reason to lynch me. I can prove I visited Mousey and found out he was town, but it would be good of him to actually say he's happy to disclose information about him as I don't want to incur his wrath - which I undoubtably will if I air it without his consent.
If the target was Heef why does that mean we lynch him? From what it looks like to me town nurse and doc were on the target of a vig/3rd party hit. If thats the case i dont see how that infers any guilt at all. Alot seems to be pushing forward on really shaky logic unless im missing something?
Thinking on it, it said it failed, which suggests Mafia used a blocking role on me last night. Need Quaggas to say how he knows Heef was the intended target really. All it looks like is a 3rd party attack on 'someone', I read Uppercuts death as being the nWo kill.
Isn't it just the Rock trying to kill someone and he was role blocked or Heef was nursed... maybe both.
Well, exactly. At the moment there's a lot of inference from the write-up, other than Quaggas seems to have some information about what went on - but has been a bit vague about it. It reads as if the Rock was making a hit on someone - from my understanding the Rock isn't likely to be mafia or 3rd party, so it suggests an attempted vigilante hit. But firstly, what's the justification for that hit based on yesterday's events and secondly - who are the characters carrying the intended target away. Perhaps the Rock is third party or maybe there's some conversion activity at play. I don't know vast amounts about wrestling, but from what I have seem it seems that the good/bad divide is readily interchangeable.
Interesting that there was no hit from Undertaker tonight. Not sure if that is likely to mean anything (wrt roleblocking/nursing), or if the serial killer just opted against it.
Was just day dreaming as you do... What if Heef is the Undertaker and the Rock was having a go at him just cause he could... The other two may have both been roleblockers one on Heef one on the Rock... Just a theory nothing more.
I'd prefer for Heef not to reveal info about me - but, if it prevents his lynching, go ahead. Heef is correct about me, and I assume he knows my character and/or role. I'm confident Heef is pretty clean.
Yeah - fair enough. I'll see what Quaggas comes back with before putting the info out there though, just in case it isn't necessary.