Current bowling rankings ftw Rating Player 715 [+22] GEC King 690 [-2] AP Farnsworth 654 [+15] SM Green 606 [-4] BOY Blunder 604 [+4] C Man 594 [+23] JU Rocker 585 [+77] SB Wilson 581 [+4] KF Tait 548 [+30] DA Eggman 500 [+35] HT Davis
Honest to God, who gives a flying **** about economy in FC cricket? You said you were happy with the wickets you took? You took a wicket. No plural. That's what I was pointing out. I wouldn't be best pleased about averaging 104 with the ball in a match.
Admitted that I thought the wickets I'd taken were actually in another round I'd looked at, but you can go and **** off if all you ever do is say "nah that's shit" cos tbph that's all you do Marcuss and that's why you piss people off. I'd take 84 and 30 something not out in a match and a wicket every week if it was on offer, and considering the fact that I haven't played any First Grade cricket whatsoever in this I'm fairly happy with the way I'm performing. If all you're gonna do is be negative then don't bother posting.
WTF, where did I even begin to mention your batting? I'd be ****ing happy if I were you. I've batted pretty poorly in this so far, until this round were I did pretty much the same as you. 120 odd runs with one not out. I pointed out the fact your bowling wasn't great this round when you were under the impression it was, if you can't handle being wrong it's not my fault. Just since you had 3 or 4 ****ing good rounds in this competition and Ged started hyping you, you've ****ing loved every minute of it. Yeah it's good to be performing well in this as it's a step up from ALC, somewhere where you've not been that great but it's not all that. Anyway, once I pointed out you were wrong you decided to use economy as a reason why you bowled well. Economy in a FC game. Seriously? Unless you're someone like Green, or at the other end of the scale going for 4-5 runs an over. Who cares about economy?
Nah, we're all meant to be nice to each other on this forum. Well played CCG! Great batting there mate! Unlucky about the bowling but at least you kept it tight.
Wow Marcuss. That's amazing. I'm completely wrong aren't I, you're right as usual. Let me ask you a question then. Would you rather have a spinner who bowls 50 odd overs in a game, takes 5 wickets in a game but goes for 100 runs in each innings? Or would you rather have a spinner who takes 1/2 wickets in a game and only goes for 100 runs in the match. Personally I'd take the latter considering the circumstance that our batting is. I'm not saying i'm godly, i'm not hyping myself up and saying I'm the best or that it was an awesome performance, but I sure as hell won't sit hear and listen to crap from you.
