Discussion in 'Matches' started by Eds, May 29, 2009.
Any answer to this?
Cos the when you get to read everything that is happening, I don't want to go through ratings that could be inaccurate and getting people dropped when they have actually had good games.
makes sense. pretty good game from me as far as I can tell then...
But surely you would just use the same rating system as before... I don't get what has changed... also this way we have no way of knowing who did have a good game and who didn't.
You can read who has had a good game! The rating system is not very accurate and can be biased towards certain positions. It really isn't that good.
Tbf though I don't think I heard some people's names at all. Luffman did nothing. Don't think I heard Edwards either, or the Laing's... need to have a rating system or stats, as what you give us is just who's involved in the Tries.
Can you put the ratings up for this game, so we can read through, and compare percieved performances to ratings?
Nah, I am not gonna do ratings for this game.
Happy to get a game. I was mentioned once in commentary....wooo hoooo!! some stats would be nice, even the biased ones.
All there tbh.
But like I said... it only shows you the tries... not the nitty gritty bits that are key.
NEED a ratings system, or a stats output.
LMAO. Should that be stretch?...There was another porno moment somewhere...
Anyway, I preferred this way of doing it. Not perfect, but better.
LOL! You forwards... who knows what goes on in those scrums.
Lol. Wanted to see if anyone would pick that up
Haha, I'm a back on here :ninja:
Any chance to escape eh... did notice you put down emergency back row however
Yeah, I was thinking of Nonu. Seen him pack down at 8/6 a few times.
Haha its annoying Eds said we have to use our cricsim names... Farnikolo was a beast
I geniunely think that if I had another yard or two of pace, I'd be a pretty good winger in real life.
If I had another couple of inches I would be a beastly flanker... Luffers to c.
Separate names with a comma.