Then document it if you think so. I've analysed his play pretty solidly for a while now and I think the claim is bogus. Third-man-in is not automatically a flop, to be clear. A flop, to me, would be considered a tackle in which the player at hand contributes nothing or extremely little to the tackle itself, be the ball carrier standing or grounded. Or, by another definition, the one in which the action corresponds to the actual name, where a player "flops" on top of an already, or near-completed tackle which was basically already effected - To that I would say you're kidding yourself. That claim is absurd and I think if you went through a game with a fine tooth comb, analysing all 40 or 50 tackles, you'd have very little evidence for it. Claiming half is a gross exaggeration on your part afaic.
Pffft. MF's already answered this but it's just that we both follow the same teams and as such the same biases. I still appreciate players that he definitely doesn't and vice versa.
