Cos the when you get to read everything that is happening, I don't want to go through ratings that could be inaccurate and getting people dropped when they have actually had good games.
But surely you would just use the same rating system as before... I don't get what has changed... also this way we have no way of knowing who did have a good game and who didn't.
You can read who has had a good game! The rating system is not very accurate and can be biased towards certain positions. It really isn't that good.
Tbf though I don't think I heard some people's names at all. Luffman did nothing. Don't think I heard Edwards either, or the Laing's... need to have a rating system or stats, as what you give us is just who's involved in the Tries.
Can you put the ratings up for this game, so we can read through, and compare percieved performances to ratings?
Happy to get a game. I was mentioned once in commentary....wooo hoooo!! some stats would be nice, even the biased ones.
But like I said... it only shows you the tries... not the nitty gritty bits that are key. NEED a ratings system, or a stats output.
LMAO. Should that be stretch?...There was another porno moment somewhere... Anyway, I preferred this way of doing it. Not perfect, but better.
Haha, yeah. I geniunely think that if I had another yard or two of pace, I'd be a pretty good winger in real life.