So yeah, anyway, I think it took 14 minutes for me to be fantastically vindicated and you to be emphatically disproved. Thoughts?
What is the principle of the argument? I find it hard to make any judgement on a player after 14 minutes in a team already beaten.
As have I. It's not that hard to throw a bullet. To execute it to perfection when it matters, however, is quite something else.
EWS thought he'd be Gidley MkII. I told him he's not a sharp-shooter and that he wouldn't have the arrogance to countermand his halves like Gidley did (too often). I think I was right. He didn't engage or look to exploit the markers, and he shoveled. I don't think either of us expected the ordinary defence and the somewhat sloppy service.
I honestly don't see how you get Reynolds onto the field in Game 3. NSW looked like shit compared to when Farah was on. He has to play 80. Maybe give the cunt 10 minutes at lock.
How can you argue with Reynolds when Queensland have DCE playing the same role? The only difference was Queensland were well and truly rolling forward when DCE came on.