The problem with this salary idea...

Discussion in 'Archive of Seasons Past' started by Farny, Aug 25, 2009.

Page 1 of 3

  1. Farny AP Farnsworth

    ...is that there are quite a few players with very low postcounts who just won't get signed for any clubs. Would be good to have some sort of free transfer on a voluntary basis for newbies.
     
    Farny, Aug 25, 2009
    #1

  2. Boobidy BJ Gemmell

    My salary is rising by the minute....Ranked 37 now.
     
    Boobidy, Aug 25, 2009
    #2

  3. Ged GEC King

    We;ve got a lot of spamming to do to catch up with our pommy counterparts.
     
    Ged, Aug 25, 2009
    #3

  4. Boobidy BJ Gemmell

    I've begun.
     
    Boobidy, Aug 25, 2009
    #4

  5. Bedsey JB Dempsey

    Someone to answer me IMO.
     
    Bedsey, Aug 25, 2009
    #5

  6. stupersteve03 SJ Cambridge

    ah you have just got to be willing to put in the hard spam yards is all, i mean between signing my contract and now i am actually about 20k undervalued
     
    stupersteve03, Aug 25, 2009
    #6

  7. Doog J McDougal

    What do you think cheetahs are here for? :p I expect low post count players to be picked up later anyway, when reserves are being looked for tbh.
     
    Doog, Aug 25, 2009
    #7

  8. Fungus K Fung

    Answered.
     
    Fungus, Aug 25, 2009
    #8

  9. Boobidy BJ Gemmell

    I'll sign my contract in a bit, once I get my value and skill up....If that's possible.
     
    Boobidy, Aug 25, 2009
    #9

  10. stupersteve03 SJ Cambridge

    IMO salary should only be used for players who are playing firsts, as in they are more like match payments then anything else, that way newbies will get teams, and the whole monetary system will continue to work
     
    stupersteve03, Aug 25, 2009
    #10

  11. Boobidy BJ Gemmell

    Do we get any benefits from this?
     
    Boobidy, Aug 25, 2009
    #11

  12. Fungus K Fung

    Fitness levels I believe.
     
    Fungus, Aug 25, 2009
    #12

  13. Boobidy BJ Gemmell

    Bigger salary increases fitness?
     
    Boobidy, Aug 25, 2009
    #13

  14. Boobidy BJ Gemmell

    Yeah, could work.
     
    Boobidy, Aug 25, 2009
    #14

  15. Doog J McDougal

    Yep, higher your salary, more consistent your performance essentially
     
    Doog, Aug 25, 2009
    #15

  16. Boobidy BJ Gemmell

    Oh yeah fair enough. So it's in teams best bets to pay overs for people.
     
    Boobidy, Aug 25, 2009
    #16

  17. Fungus K Fung

    The less you pay for people, the more money you can use for other things, such as bigger stadiums, and training facilities(?).
     
    Fungus, Aug 25, 2009
    #17

  18. Doog J McDougal

    other things to factor in too, but pretty much.
     
    Doog, Aug 25, 2009
    #18

  19. stupersteve03 SJ Cambridge

    in looking over the books for a season though, (without knowing all the variables yet) it seems like financially it would not be viable to have a group of good players and pay them all maximum, you need to be at least a little frugal
     
    stupersteve03, Aug 25, 2009
    #19

  20. Boobidy BJ Gemmell

    This isn't GLB.
     
    Boobidy, Aug 25, 2009
    #20
Page 1 of 3

Share This Page