I reckon the should go to whoever is leading the comp... (so like 1st picks their rep team, then 2nd can choose one,then 3rd etc etc) Problem with that is when do we choose, or do we do all rep stuf post season?
After that I reckon they should be given to either whoever's winning or whoever's active, rather than just people calling it. I call NSW, just in case it does go that way though.
The problem with that is the thing he wanted most was to pick a team of his favourites etc, that shouldn't happen with rep teams.
I was going to not have a side and run the NSW team, but I ended up having a side anyway because we needed one more. I wasn't sure if the interest would be there for rep games, but it seems it is. I'd be happy for AVA to run NSW; it'd give him an incentive to follow the rest of the competition.
If it ends up as a mid-season thing where players miss games, it shouldn't be given to people already involved who would just not select their own so they could use them in the normal competition. Plenty of issues to be resolved. Could always use a selection panel as well.
Yes. I think we should add all the representative matches that are held in a regular season of the NRL.
40-man squads. All the good Poms who have played Tests will get taken eventually, purely because they're better than picking crap Toyota Cup players.