Yeah he's been averaging 40 consistently with the bat at BS level for the last three seasons and late 30s to high 40s with the ball, so he'd be looking more at batting 6 or 7 and being the fifth bowler than playing as the fourth bowler.
There are plenty of rounds before origin and Hallett is in great form. I know he won't make the side on 2 good rounds but saying the suggestion of him is stupid is that from someone who didn't think.
He took 3 wickets against a Cyclones batting line up which severly unperformed, and came out of Rd 2 with figures of 3/168. Yea, great form. Oh really? Fact of the matter is that Orr >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hallet because he has managed to do it for multiple seasons let alone 2 rounds.
Maybe your batting lineup underperformed from good bowling. Yeah, he won't get picked of 2 rounds form, he will get picked off the 7 or 8 before origin. Unless Ged is picking the team now? Hallet has 6wickets @ 37 and 105 runs @ 35. Orr has 5 wickets @ 19 and 16 runs @ 9. I know who Ged would prefer at 8 when King is at 9.
Possibly neither, as I'd imagine Perry could be the second spinner. Otherwise you're left with only the two seamers.
Oh yeah and Orr has only got wickets against an underperforming Gamblers side on a crumbling wicket :rollseyes:
Yeah I'm not saying he is a definite or anything like that. But for someone to say that the suggestion of him getting a game is stupid is, well, stupid.
And I think I've got more chance at being second spinner than Perry. He bowls non stop pies in origin.
LooooL there you go using 2 rounds as a sample. Keep digging. I never realised that the Gamblers played in the BS in previous seasons.